I had to review at least one horror film in the run-up to Halloween! With a brilliant first act, a decent second and a disastrous third, 28 Days Later, directed by Danny Boyle, is a good mature horror film with empathetic characters and an unnerving depiction of a zombie apocalypse.

Waking up in a hospital, Jim (Cillian Murphy) discovers that the entirety of Britain’s populace has been infected by a ‘rage’ virus, turning them into zombies. After getting attacked by some of the infected, he finds Seleena (Naomie Harris), another survivor. While wandering the streets of London, they find Frank (Brenden Gleeson) and his teenage daughter Hannah (Megan Burns). When Frank plays them a radio broadcast from a military base in Manchester, the group decides to trace its source and journey through infected England.

While Jim may come across as a basic ‘every man’ character, we see through his dialogue with Seleena and particularly when he visits the house of his dead parents, that Jim is compassionate and is willing to protect those he loves.

Of course these are values most people have but in the film’s hostile environment, where you have to fight to survive you feel worried for Jim as he struggles to support those values while he argues with Seleena.

She believes that trying to protect loved ones only slows you down and will get you killed. As the film progresses and the characters get to know and like one another, Seleena begins to understand the purpose behind Jim’s common values and starts to let go of her hierarchical viewpoint.

This wouldhave been a fantastic end to 28 Days Later, but unfortunately, it occurs halfway through the second act. The film’s climax takes place at the military base in Manchester where it is revealed that the soldiers want to keep Seleena and Hannah as sex slaves to repopulate the country.

What 28 Days is trying to do thematically at this point I have no idea. Jim tries to escape with the girls but is captured and taken out to be shot. He then escapes his executioners and, after breaking into the mansion and releasing an imprisoned zombie onto the troops, successfully flees with Seleena and Hannah.

I thought that maybe Jim sabotaging the base and rescuing the girls might’ve suggested that he’d adapted to the hierarchal world Seleena believed in and learned to fight for himself.

But why at a military base? Why couldn’t Jim learn that during his journey with Seleena? He could’ve seen why it’s important to let go of emotions and fight to survive. Doing it at the military base after Seleena has abandoned those beliefs doesn’t make sense to me.

Overall despite its excellent first act, great cinematography and good performances (apart from Megan Burns, Hannah is a robot. Seriously. She can’t act) 28 Days Later should be remembered for its unique contribution to the zombie genre in terms of ideas. Beyond that, it’s a great film that dies at the end.

I give 28 Days Later a mediocre 5 out of 10.

4 responses to “Overrated? 28 Days Later (2002) Review”

  1. Chris Orr Avatar
    Chris Orr

    5?! Seriously! I mean i know this film has a few problems but it is almost solely responsible for the rise of zombies films in the 2000’s. It deserves at least a 7/8 in my opinion

    Like

    1. Luke Avatar

      Yeah, 5 isn’t that terrible though. It succeeds in most areas, it just fails in one of if not the most important one. plot and character. But yes, I agree, its impact is significant. It must be remembered for that.

      Like

  2. […] first films I reviewed on this blog, all the way back in 2015. I was very scathing in my review of 28 Days Later, I was younger and more pretentious back then, giving it a harsh 5 out of 10. If I reviewed it […]

    Like

  3. […] was pretty hard on 28 Days Later when I covered it in 2015. It’s one of the few blog posts of mine that continues to get reads to this day. I must confess […]

    Like

Leave a comment